A Critical Essay on Gerald F. Else’s Plato and Aristotle on Poetry
Introduction
Gerald
F. Else’s Plato and Aristotle on Poetry is a seminal
exploration of the philosophical debates on poetry and its place in society as
understood by two of the greatest thinkers of antiquity. Else brings a
scholarly rigor to his comparative analysis of Plato and Aristotle, navigating
their seemingly contradictory yet intrinsically connected views. This essay
critically examines Else’s insights, highlighting his treatment of the
philosophical underpinnings, his interpretation of poetic mimesis, and his
exploration of poetry’s moral and educational roles.
Plato’s Moral Critique and the
Banishment of Poetry
Plato’s
critique of poetry, as Else elucidates, is deeply rooted in his broader
metaphysical and ethical framework. In the Republic,
Plato famously advocates for the expulsion of poets from his ideal state. Else
contextualizes this within Plato’s theory of forms, where poetry is seen as a
mere imitation of the physical world, which itself is a flawed imitation of the
realm of forms. Thus, poetry, according to Plato, is thrice removed from the
truth.
Else
adeptly critiques Plato’s assertion that poetry corrupts the soul by appealing
to the baser instincts of humanity. He challenges Plato’s sweeping
generalizations about the emotional and irrational appeal of poetry, pointing
out that Plato’s own works, particularly the Dialogues,
often rely on rhetorical and dramatic elements that resemble poetry. Here, Else
reveals an inherent tension in Plato’s philosophy, a point that invites readers
to consider whether Plato’s condemnation of poetry is consistent or selectively
applied.
Aristotle’s Defense: Mimesis
as Catharsis and Intellectual Engagement
In
contrast, Aristotle’s Poetics offers a more sympathetic
and systematic approach to poetry, which Else regards as a direct response to
Plato’s criticisms. Aristotle redefines mimesis not as mere mimicry but as a
creative act that reveals universal truths through particular instances. Else
emphasizes Aristotle’s nuanced understanding of poetry’s capacity to educate
and evoke emotions, arguing that its emotional impact, far from corrupting, has
a purgative or cathartic function.
Else’s
treatment of Aristotle’s concept of catharsis is particularly commendable. He
navigates the complex interpretations of catharsis, considering it both as an
emotional release and as an intellectual clarification. This dual perspective,
as Else presents it, underscores poetry’s dual function: it engages the
emotions while also offering philosophical insights, thereby bridging the gap
between the rational and the emotional—a direct rebuttal to Plato’s dichotomy.
Poetry’s Role in Ethical and
Civic Education
Both
Plato and Aristotle agree, albeit differently, on the profound influence of
poetry on society. Else’s analysis brings to light how this shared concern
underpins their philosophical divergence. Plato’s anxiety about poetry stems
from its power to shape moral character in ways that he deems uncontrollable.
Aristotle, however, sees this influence as an opportunity for ethical
cultivation when guided by the principles of good art.
Else’s
nuanced reading highlights the implications of these views for the broader
discourse on art and society. He draws connections to modern debates on
censorship, artistic freedom, and the social responsibility of creators,
showing the enduring relevance of Plato and Aristotle’s arguments.
Conclusion
Gerald
F. Else’s Plato and Aristotle on Poetry is a masterful
exposition of ancient philosophical debates that continue to resonate in
contemporary discussions about art, morality, and education. By
presenting Plato and Aristotle not as adversaries but as participants in a
shared inquiry, Else encourages readers to appreciate the complexity and depth
of their ideas. His work serves as both a critique and a celebration of their
enduring legacy, offering a balanced perspective that honours the intellectual
rigor of these philosophical giants.
Ultimately,
Else’s scholarship invites us to reconsider our own assumptions about poetry
and its place in human life, reminding us that the questions posed by Plato and
Aristotle remain as vital today as they were in antiquity.
******
