Critical Analysis of Philip Sidney’s
An Apologie for Poetrie
Introduction
Philip Sidney’s An Apologie for Poetrie (also known as The Defence
of Poesy) is a seminal work of literary criticism in the English
Renaissance. Written around 1580 in response to Puritan attacks on poetry,
especially Stephen Gosson’s The School of Abuse,
Sidney’s essay is a passionate defense of poetry’s moral, aesthetic, and
intellectual value. Drawing on classical, medieval, and Renaissance sources,
Sidney provides a comprehensive argument for the significance of poetry in
human culture. This essay critically examines Sidney’s arguments, their
structure, and their enduring influence.
Historical and Contextual Background
·
Cultural Renaissance: During Sidney’s time, the Renaissance in England had brought renewed
interest in classical literature, humanism, and the arts. However, Puritan reformers viewed poetry and drama with
suspicion, associating them with moral corruption and idleness.
·
Stephen Gosson’s Critique: Gosson’s The School of Abuse (1579) attacked
poetry as frivolous and morally degenerate, prompting Sidney to respond with An
Apologie for Poetrie.
·
Purpose: Sidney’s
essay defends the dignity of poetry, asserting
its ability to educate, inspire, and morally elevate.
Key Arguments in An Apologie for Poetrie
1. The Dignity of Poetry
Sidney opens by
emphasizing the ancient and universal importance of poetry:
· Origins of Poetry: He traces its roots to antiquity,
highlighting how poets were once revered as seers,
prophets, and teachers.
·
Definition of Poetry: Sidney defines poetry broadly as an art of imitation (mimesis)
that combines delight and instruction. Unlike
history, which records facts, and philosophy, which provides abstract truths, poetry
synthesizes these elements, offering imaginative and impactful lessons.
2. The Educational Value of Poetry
Sidney argues
that poetry surpasses history and philosophy in its ability to teach virtue:
·
Comparison with History: History is limited to recounting specific events and individuals, often
lacking universal applicability.
·
Comparison with Philosophy: Philosophy, while offering universal truths, is
abstract and inaccessible to the average person.
Poetry, by contrast, communicates universal truths in a vivid, engaging manner.
·
Poetry’s Didactic Nature: Sidney stresses poetry’s unique capacity to “teach and
delight,” arguing that it is more effective than other disciplines in inspiring
virtuous action.
3. The Imaginative Power of Poetry
Sidney extols
the poet as a creator (vates), whose imagination transcends the mundane
world to create ideal forms:
·
Imagination and Creativity: Poets are likened to demi-gods, shaping a “golden world”
beyond the imperfections of reality.
·
Moral Idealism: Through this
idealized vision, poetry inspires readers to strive for virtue and perfection.
4. Rebuttal of Criticisms Against Poetry
Sidney directly
addresses the main critiques of poetry:
·
Poetry as a Source of Lies: Sidney refutes this by arguing that poets do not claim
to recount factual truths; instead, they present imaginative truths that
inspire moral reflection.
·
Immorality in Poetry: While some works may be morally corrupt, Sidney asserts that this is the fault of individual poets, not poetry itself.
Properly composed poetry upholds moral values.
·
Idleness and Waste of Time: Sidney argues that poetry is a productive activity that
nurtures the mind and soul, far removed from idleness.
5. The Role of English Poetry
Sidney laments the underdevelopment of English poetry compared to Greek, Latin, and Italian traditions. He calls for
English poets to rise to the standards of their classical predecessors,
contributing to the cultural elevation of England.
Critical Evaluation of Sidney’s Arguments
Strengths
1.
Humanist Perspective:
Sidney’s essay exemplifies Renaissance humanism, celebrating the power of human
creativity and the transformative potential of art.
2.
Comprehensive Defense:
His methodical approach, addressing both theoretical and practical objections
to poetry, provides a robust framework for understanding its value.
3.
Timeless Relevance:
Sidney’s assertion that art serves both ethical and aesthetic purposes
resonates across centuries, influencing later critics like Coleridge and Shelley.
4.
Rhetorical Mastery:
The essay’s eloquent prose and persuasive reasoning reflect Sidney’s
intellectual and literary prowess.
Limitations
1.
Idealized View of Poetry:
Sidney’s emphasis on poetry’s moral and didactic role can seem overly
idealistic. Not all poetry aims to teach virtue, and his framework may exclude
works created for entertainment or aesthetic pleasure.
2.
Eurocentric Bias:
Sidney’s focus on classical and European traditions overlooks the rich poetic
traditions of other cultures, limiting his claims of universality.
3.
Practical Application:
While Sidney provides a compelling theoretical defense, his argument lacks
concrete examples of how poetry can achieve its didactic aims.
Influence and Legacy
1.
Impact on Literary Criticism:
An Apologie for Poetrie is one of the first significant works of literary theory
in English, shaping subsequent discussions on the purpose and nature of
art.
2.
Inspiration for Later Writers:
Sidney’s ideas influenced Romantic poets like Wordsworth
and Shelley, who also emphasized poetry’s
moral and imaginative power.
3.
Relevance in Modern Criticism:
The essay’s exploration of poetry’s societal role continues to inform debates
on art’s function in contemporary culture.
Conclusion
Philip Sidney’s An Apologie for Poetrie is a masterful defense of literature, blending
Renaissance ideals with timeless insights into the human condition. His
arguments not only uphold the dignity of poetry but also advocate for its
transformative potential. While not without its limitations, Sidney’s essay remains
a cornerstone of literary criticism, inspiring
readers and writers to appreciate the profound power of art in shaping thought
and society.
*****
