Critical Essay on W.K. Wimsatt’s The Intentional Fallacy

 

Critical Essay on W.K. Wimsatt’s The Intentional Fallacy

Introduction

W.K. Wimsatt’s essay The Intentional Fallacy (co-written with Monroe C. Beardsley, 1946) is a seminal text in literary theory that argues against the relevance of authorial intention in the interpretation of literary works. As a cornerstone of New Criticism, this essay fundamentally shifted the focus of literary criticism toward the text itself, advocating for an objective analysis of literary meaning. This critical essay examines Wimsatt’s central arguments, evaluates their theoretical and practical implications, and addresses the limitations of his approach.

The Argument: Intention as a Fallacy

In The Intentional Fallacy, Wimsatt and Beardsley argue that the intention of the author is neither a reliable nor a necessary criterion for interpreting a literary work. They claim that a poem (or any literary work) is a self-contained, autonomous entity that should be evaluated based on its internal features, such as structure, language, and aesthetic effect. Any attempt to understand a work by referring to the author’s intended meaning constitutes a critical error—what they term the “intentional fallacy.”

Their argument hinges on three key points:

1.The Irrelevance of Intentions: The authors assert that once a work is published, it exists independently of the creator’s intentions. The meaning of a work resides in its text, not in the mind of its author. Wimsatt famously likens the relationship between a poem and its author to that between a pudding and its recipe—the pudding stands alone and is judged by its taste.

2.The Impossibility of Accessing Intentions: Wimsatt and Beardsley emphasize that an author’s intentions are often inaccessible or unknowable. Biographical evidence, letters, or diaries might provide some insight into an author’s thoughts, but such evidence is external to the work and cannot determine its meaning.

3.The Priority of the Text: They argue that meaning is created through the interaction of the text with the reader. The text contains all the necessary evidence for interpretation within its structure, language, and form.

The Impact of New Criticism

The argument in The Intentional Fallacy aligns with the broader principles of New Criticism, which emphasizes the autonomy of the literary work and the importance of close reading. By rejecting external factors such as authorial intention, historical context, or audience reception, Wimsatt and Beardsley sought to establish literary criticism as an objective discipline. Their essay contributed to a methodological shift that prioritized detailed textual analysis over biographical or historical approaches.

Strengths of the Argument

1.Focus on the Text: One of the most significant contributions of The Intentional Fallacy is its insistence on the primacy of the text. This approach fosters a detailed and disciplined engagement with the language, structure, and form of a work, encouraging critics to uncover its intrinsic meaning.

2.Democratization of Interpretation: By divorcing meaning from authorial intention, Wimsatt and Beardsley empower readers to engage with texts on their own terms. This perspective democratizes literary interpretation, emphasizing the text’s relationship with its audience rather than its creator.

3.Defensibility of Interpretation: The rejection of authorial intention helps protect literary criticism from subjective or speculative readings. By grounding interpretation in the text, Wimsatt’s framework provides a more stable foundation for critical discourse.

Critiques and Limitations

While Wimsatt’s essay has been influential, it has also faced significant critiques, particularly from later schools of literary theory:

1.Historical and Cultural Contexts: Critics have argued that Wimsatt’s decontextualized approach overlooks the historical, social, and cultural forces that shape literary production. Poststructuralist and cultural critics contend that meaning is never entirely self-contained but is shaped by broader discursive and material conditions.

2.Authorial Intent as a Construct: The advent of poststructuralism and psychoanalysis introduced the idea that the “author” is not a unified, conscious entity but a construct shaped by language, ideology, and the unconscious. In this view, dismissing authorial intention may oversimplify the complex relationship between author, text, and meaning.

3.Reader-Response Criticism: Wimsatt and Beardsley’s emphasis on textual autonomy has been challenged by reader-response critics, who argue that meaning emerges from the interaction between text and reader. This perspective shifts attention from the text itself to the interpretive processes of the audience.

4.The “Death of the Author”: Roland Barthes’ essay The Death of the Author (1967) builds on and departs from Wimsatt’s ideas. While Barthes agrees with the irrelevance of authorial intention, he extends the argument by emphasizing the multiplicity of meanings generated by the reader’s engagement with the text.

Contemporary Relevance

Despite its limitations, The Intentional Fallacy remains relevant in contemporary literary studies. Its call for rigorous textual analysis continues to inform pedagogical practices, particularly in undergraduate education. Moreover, the essay serves as a critical touchstone for debates about the role of context, intention, and audience in literary interpretation.

In today’s critical landscape, Wimsatt’s ideas are often revisited in dialogue with alternative approaches. For instance, while New Historicism and cultural studies emphasize the importance of contextual analysis, they also acknowledge the value of close reading as a methodological tool. Similarly, while poststructuralist theories challenge the autonomy of the text, they build on Wimsatt’s critique of authorial intention to explore the instability and multiplicity of meaning.

Conclusion

W.K. Wimsatt’s The Intentional Fallacy is a foundational text that transformed the practice of literary criticism by challenging the relevance of authorial intention. By emphasizing the autonomy of the text and the importance of close reading, Wimsatt provided a framework for analyzing literature that remains influential today. However, his decontextualized approach has been critiqued for its neglect of historical and cultural factors, as well as its limited engagement with reader agency.

As literary studies continue to evolve, The Intentional Fallacy endures as both a methodological guide and a critical provocation, reminding scholars of the complexities involved in interpreting literary texts. While its ideas are no longer accepted uncritically, the essay remains a cornerstone of critical inquiry, shaping how literature is studied, taught, and understood.

******