Wimsatt and Brooks’s Literary Criticism: A Short History

 

Wimsatt and Brooks’s Literary Criticism: A Short History

Introduction

Cleanth Brooks and W. K. Wimsatt’s Literary Criticism: A Short History is a seminal work that traces the evolution of critical thought from antiquity to the modern era. Published in 1957, this comprehensive volume reflects the authors’ New Critical sensibilities, emphasizing the intrinsic value of the text over extrinsic factors such as the author’s biography or historical context. This essay critically examines their historiography, methodological approach, and key contributions, while also addressing the limitations of their framework within the broader landscape of literary criticism.

A New Critical Lens on History

Brooks and Wimsatt approach the history of literary criticism through the lens of New Criticism, a movement that champions close reading and the autonomy of the literary text. Their emphasis on the aesthetic and formal qualities of literature shapes their discussion of critical traditions, from Plato and Aristotle to Romantic and modernist thought.

While this perspective provides a focused lens, it also reveals a selective bias. The authors prioritize traditions and thinkers that align with New Critical principles, such as Aristotle’s formalism or the Romantic emphasis on poetic autonomy, while downplaying or critiquing approaches that emphasize sociopolitical, psychological, or biographical contexts. This focus, though coherent, may seem reductive in its treatment of more diverse critical perspectives, such as Marxism or psychoanalysis.

Contributions to the Study of Literary Traditions

One of the strengths of Literary Criticism: A Short History lies in its clear exposition of key critical figures and movements. The authors effectively distil complex ideas into accessible narratives, making the book a valuable resource for students and scholars alike. Their analysis of classical criticism, for instance, provides a lucid discussion of Plato’s skepticism of poetry and Aristotle’s defense of its mimetic and cathartic functions.

The book also offers incisive readings of Romantic criticism, particularly the works of Wordsworth and Coleridge, highlighting the shift toward individual imagination and the organic unity of the work of art. By tracing these threads through the centuries, Brooks and Wimsatt underscore the enduring relevance of questions about form, function, and the nature of poetic language.

However, the book’s teleological framing, which positions New Criticism as the culmination of literary critical evolution, raises concerns about its historical objectivity. The implicit suggestion that earlier traditions were incomplete steps toward New Critical ideals risks oversimplifying the rich plurality of critical thought.

Formalism and the Autonomy of the Text

Central to Brooks and Wimsatt’s historiography is their belief in the autonomy of the literary text. This principle, rooted in their New Critical approach, leads them to emphasize close reading and the internal coherence of a work. The authors celebrate critics who advocate for the intrinsic study of literature, such as the Russian Formalists and T. S. Eliot, while critiquing approaches that foreground extrinsic elements like authorial intent or historical background.

This focus on textual autonomy has had a profound impact on literary studies, encouraging rigorous analytical methods and emphasizing the complexity of literary language. However, it has also faced criticism for marginalizing the social, historical, and political dimensions of literature. In an era increasingly concerned with issues of identity, power, and representation, the New Critical framework can seem limited in its applicability.

Limitations and Legacy

The limitations of Literary Criticism: A Short History largely stem from its methodological biases. By privileging New Critical ideals, Brooks and Wimsatt offer a selective reading of literary history that excludes or diminishes alternative critical paradigms. For instance, feminist, Marxist, and poststructuralist critiques receive little attention, reflecting the authors’ preference for formalist methodologies.

Despite these shortcomings, the book’s contributions to the field are undeniable. It provides a cohesive narrative of literary criticism’s evolution, offering insights into the enduring questions and debates that have shaped the discipline. Moreover, its emphasis on close reading and the aesthetic value of literature remains influential, serving as a foundation for subsequent critical approaches.

Conclusion

Wimsatt and Brooks’s Literary Criticism: A Short History is both a product of its time and a significant contribution to the field of literary studies. Its New Critical perspective offers a coherent framework for understanding the evolution of critical thought, while its lucid exposition makes complex ideas accessible. However, its selective focus and exclusion of alternative methodologies invite critique, particularly in light of the pluralistic approaches that have since reshaped literary criticism. As both a historical document and a critical guide, the book continues to provoke discussion and debate, underscoring the dynamic and contested nature of literary studies.

******